© 1981 Oxford University Press
research-article |
Cigarette Smoking and Drug Use in Schoolchildren. II Factors Associated with Smoking
* University of Newcastle New South Wales, 2308
** University of Newcastle New South Wales, 2308
Health Commission of New South Wales (Hunter Region) Newcastle 2300
O'Connell DL [Faculty of Mathematics, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, 2308, Australia], Alexander HM, Dobson AJ, Lioyd DM, Hardes GR, Springthorpe HJ and Leeder SR. Cigarette smoking and drug use in school-children. II Factors associated with smoking. International Journal of Epidemiology 1981, 10: 223–231.
In 1979 as the first stage in the evaluation of an educational strategy to discourage children from smoking, we surveyed over 6000 10–12 year old primary school children in the Hunter Health Region (New South Wales, Australia) to assess the prevalence of smoking and to identify some of the social and personal factors associated with this phenomenon. Logistic regression was used to determine the relative importance of the key factors in relation to the proportion of smokers in the ‘recent’ and ‘regular’ smoking categories. Friends' smoking behaviour was the best predictor of the child's smoking status followed in order by approval of advertising, siblings' smoking behaviour, amount of money available to spend weekly, sex, age and finally parents' smoking habits. Other factors such as size of family, position of the child in the family, country of birth of parents, father's occupation, having a single parent and urban or non-urban location of schools were all significantly associated with smoking prevalence in these children. Linear modelling techniques used in the analysis showed girls and non-smokers to have less favouring attitudes to smoking and tobacco advertising than boys and smokers. Significant differences in knowledge occurred between categories of smokers. Most children claiming not to smoke disapproved of advertising and did not intend to smoke in the future. Among current smokers, some with natural or favouring attitudes were ambivalent about future smoking. Our data suggest that intervention in the field of cigarette advertising may be the most direct and effective means of reducting prevalence of smoking in children.
Revised 17 February 1981
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. S. Soteriades and J. R. DiFranza Parent's Socioeconomic Status, Adolescents' Disposable Income, and Adolescents' Smoking Status in Massachusetts Am J Public Health, July 1, 2003; 93(7): 1155 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Allen, W. A. Donohue, A. Griffin, D. Ryan, and M. M. M. Turner Comparing The Influence Of Parents And Peers On The Choice To Use Drugs: A Meta-Analytic Summary of the Literature Criminal Justice and Behavior, April 1, 2003; 30(2): 163 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Kessler, J. P. Wilkenfeld, and L. J. Thompson The Food and Drug Administration's Rule on Tobacco: Blending Science and Law Pediatrics, June 1, 1997; 99(6): 884 - 884. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. S. Mindell Tobacco advertising The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, April 1, 1995; 115(2): 84 - 89.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. R. Stanton and P. A. Silva School achievement as an independent predictor of smoking in childhood and early adolescence Health Education Journal, January 1, 1991; 50(2): 84 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Young, A. V. Swan, and J. Melia Cigarette advertising and the youth market Health Education Journal, January 1, 1989; 48(3): 113 - 116. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. D. Thornburg and Z. Aras Physical Characteristics of Developing Adolescents Journal of Adolescent Research, March 1, 1986; 1(1): 47 - 78.
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.P. Aitken, D.S. Leathar, and S.I. Squair Children's opinions on whether or not cigarette advertisements should be banned Health Education Journal, January 1, 1986; 45(4): 204 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|