Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BENNETT, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by FRASER, I. G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BENNETT, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by FRASER, I. G. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1972 Oxford University Press

research-article

Impact of a Screening Programme in General Practice: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A. E. BENNETT1, and IAN G. P. FRASER2

1 Director, Health Services Evaluation Group, Department of the Regius Professor of Medicine, University of Oxford 9, Keble Road, Oxford, England
2 Area Medical Officer, County of Northumberland England

Requests for reprints may be addressed to Dr. A. E. Benness

Bennett, A. E. (Department of the Regius Professor of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, England), and Fraser, I. G. P. Impact of a screening programme in general practice: a randomized controlled trial. Int J. Epid. 1972,1: 55–60.

Male patients, aged 50–59, were allocated randomly into three groups. Group 1 served as a control group; Group 2 were asked to complete and return a mailed questionnaire and were subsequently invited to attend their general practitioner for further examination of symptoms declared in their answers; Group 3 were asked to complete the questionnaire and were all subsequently invited to undergo a full examination. 95.4 per cent of patients completed questionnaires and 90–2 per cent co-operated fully.

During the study the proportion of patients consulting their doctors in Groups 2 and 3 was significantly increased. However, there were no differences between groups in frequency of ‘new’ consultations or per cent of patients making new consultations. Content and outcome of new consultations did not differ significantly between groups. Data on time involvement in routine health examinations are considered. The total consultation time for Group 3 was increased by 10.5 per cent. The significance of findings is discussed with the need for further information on efficiency of screening procedures and the effectiveness of early diagnosis in reducing morbidity and mortality of chronic disease in middle age.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.